I think these are all open, I mean they are on github
@Alonealastalovedalongthe on github != open. it's effectively coyprighted by the repo owner by default (I learned this recently)
Ughhh. Though they have links to licenses for each font in this case
@Alonealastalovedalongthe yeahh :( I'd still give it a look and get it from the source if possible.
thanks for linking me!
people use the word like a verb, sometimes, like it's something you *do*: Infinitive form, 'to copyright', he/she/it copyrights, you/we/they copyright, etc
but that's not it: It's the default state, once a qualifying work is created, basically. You just make it and BOOM copyright is immediately there.
Yeah. I see that kind of thing a lot.
But here's the thing: It's not a choice an artist makes, at least right off the bat. They can't help it, it's not their fault that copyright sticks to their stuff like some kind of legal afterbirth.
What they can do is license their work. But people hate on that whole process so much that many don't want to bother.
Which means the locked-down, long-lived legal default wins.
Maybe fair use rights & right-of-first-sale confuses people if or when they hit the walls of copyright restrictions.
Plus, the US acceded to Berne comparatively only recently. The time when one did have to act specifically to put a work under copyright remains in living memory. Easy to see how some may have passed on stale info.
Plus, there are plenty of other intricacies to get caught up in.
@vincentsautter ayyee thanks!
@jalcine Why not use a system font stack as a starting point for now? This way you can reasonably expect your content to be readable on common devices/platforms.
@jalcine I like the Source family, open/free is a little sticky when it comes to type
Social is the primary social media platform for the forth coming fourth version of Play Vicious, a new initiative built to bring attention to the plethora of creative acts that don't get the shine they deserve.
For more details about the project and how to support, go here.